So, Sarah Palin was not “really” a member of the Alaska Independence Party, she says. Her husband was.
ST. PAUL, Minnesota – Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s husband, Todd, twice registered as a member of the Alaskan Independence Party, a fierce states’ rights group that wants to turn all federal lands in Alaska back to the state. Sarah Palin herself was never a member of the party, according to state officials.
Source: MSNBC
emphasis added
So, she just was sleeping with the enemy.
“Enemy?” you ask.
Yep, enemy, I answer.
How else can you explain these words from the founder of the AIP?
“The fires of Hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government, and I won’t be buried under their damn flag! I’ll be buried in Dawson, and when Alaska is an independent nation, they can bring my bones home.”
You can get an even better idea from “Mudflats”, an Alaskan political blog with an insight into the doings of upper one that is way beyond the understanding of us in the lower 48.
Strangely, in light of this new patriotic furor, the following video has not gained much traction in this election. It surfaced some time ago, and I’ve posted it here before, but its worthy of another look. This is a meeting of the Alaskan Independence Party. The speaker is Vice Chairman of the AIP, Dexter Clark. A partial transcript is below. It’s worth watching in full.
The Alaskan Independence Party believes that Alaska may have become a state against its will. Anyone in the party today, is likely there because they think Alaska would do just fine without the rest of the country being attached to it. The image, on most maps, of Alaska detached from the rest of the country in its own little box works for them just fine.
They don’t like the way the statehood vote was worded, and Clark explains why.
The basic argument of the Alaskan Independence Party has always been the number one plank in our platform – the question of our vote to become a state. So…the most blaring disparity in that vote was the definition of an eligible voter. Among those qualified to cast a ballot were 41,000 American soldiers and 36,000 dependents. Now, to the native population of Alaska, to me, these were occupation troops! And they were made eligible and, in fact encouraged to vote. There were educational meetings held on the military bases. I can’t imagine them telling anyone that anything but that statehood would be very good for the military – in fact they still have 6, 7 big bases and numerous smaller holdings in the state. Statehood would be good for the military. Now can you imagine the international uproar if American troops had all went and got their purple fingers in Iraq?
After Clark’s discussion of the American ‘occupying troops’ getting the right to vote on Alaska statehood, he goes on to say that Alaskans should have been able to vote to remain a territory, become a commonwealth, become a state or become an independent nation. In reality, voters were only given the option: Statehood? Yes or No.
Now, we get to the interesting part, just before 6:00 on the video.
“Our current governor, we mentioned at the last conference, the one we were hoping would get elected, Sarah Palin, did get elected. There’s a joke, she’s a pretty good looking gal, there’s a joke goes around we’re the coldest state with the hottest governor. (laughter) And there was a lot of talk about her moving up. She was an AIP member before she got the job as a mayor of a small town — that was a non-partisan job. But to get along and go along — she eventually joined the Republican Party, where she had all kinds of problems with their ethics, and well, I won’t go into that. She also had about an 80% approval rating, and is pretty well sympathetic to her former membership.“
What Clark is saying here, is that Palin’s philosophical loyalties lie with the Alaska Independence Party, but in order to get elected, she had to distance herself from the AIP and pretend to be a Republican, because that was the only way for her to get elected. But not to worry, Clark reassures those in attendance, her heart is still with us at the AIP, and her sympathies are with our agenda, namely, Alaskan ndependence.
He goes on:
If there is ever a time that is right for change, this is it. [snip] The pitfalls of an organized political party – you don’t have any control over who joins that party. They put the X next to it on the registration form, and if they join the — go into the primary, and win that primary, they’re your candidate, like it or not. I think Ron Paul has kind of proven that. He’s a dyed -in-the-wool Libertarian. He came to Alaska and spoke as a Libertarian. And he put the Republican label on to get elected. That’s all there is to it. And any one of your organizations should be using that same tactic to infiltrate.
Palin claims to have been a member of the Republican Party since 1982. Clark is telling us that Palin ‘marked the Republican box”, but she isn’t one. He loves the fact that she got elected. He’s already dreaming about ripping one of those stars off the flag. And though Sarah Palin’s membership is not documented officially, there is no dispute that Todd Palin was a card-carrying member of the AIP as recently as 2002 when his wife was the mayor of Wasilla. After that, he decided to change his registration to “Unaffiliated.”
How does the rest of the country feel about the concept of Alaska secession, especially considering the strategic importance of the oil reserves in Alaska of which Governor Palin is so fond of reminding us? Works well for the nation of Alaska, but not so well for the truncated version of the United States of America it leaves behind.
And finally, here’s the quote of the day from AIP founder Joe Vogler.
“The fires of Hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government, and I won’t be buried under their damn flag! I’ll be buried in Dawson, and when Alaska is an independent nation, they can bring my bones home.”
Reverend Wright suddenly sounds stunningly patriotic.
Sarah Palin, meanwhile, is saying that the fact that Barack Obama served on the same non-profit board as Bill Ayers a Weather Underground member 40 years ago, “is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect, imperfect enough, that he’s palling around with terrorists who would target their own country.” She continued, “This is not a man who sees America like you and I see America,” Palin said.
Here’s Palin addressing last year’s Alaska Independence Party’s convention.
So, how does Sarah Palin “see Ameirca?” Does she see it as “so imperfect” that one of its 50 states needs to vote on whether it wants to secede from the Union? Should a political party in this state “target its own country,” and if successful, devastate energy reserves, and compromise the national security of the rest of the nation by taking its oil, and leaving? Maybe, maybe not. But you just watched her tell the group whose purpose it is to vote on that issue to “keep up the good work.”
If Senator Obama had made such an address to an Illinois secessionist party, or any other group who wanted to make off with 13% of the nations oil supply, what would be said about his patriotism?
Tags: Alaska | Iraq | independence | terrorist | Senator | World | party | American | Imagine | Vote | Obama | State | CLARK | STATEHOOD | Alaskan | Dexter | Palin | mccain-palin
Source: mudflats.wordpress.com
Tags: 2008 Election, Alaska, Alaskan, American, CLARK, Dexter, GOP whores, Imagine, independence, Iraq, Joe, John McCain, lies, mccain-palin, more GOP corruption, more GOP lies, Obama, Palin, party, Sarah Palin, Senator, State, STATEHOOD, terrorist, vogler, Vote

October 13, 2008 at 3:18 am |
Put down the kool aid. You’ve had enough.
In the primaries, I did not vote for John McCain. He is not a Conservative, he is a Moderate (and so is George Bush).
In this election, I am playing defense with my vote. That’s why I will vote for McCain. In the war on terror, I sure as hell do not want Barack Hussein Obama as our Commander in Chief.
But I am so disgusted right now, I may vote Libertarian.
Government is NOT the answer. Government is the problem. But you people cannot stop looking towards our state capitals and Washington D.C. as The Mecca.
If you people want socialized medicine, the government in charge of mortgages and more government interfering in our lives, then move to France. Please.
October 29, 2008 at 1:20 pm |
I agree. NO matter what you think of McCain – or Palin, for that matter – you are NUTS if you vote for Obama and think he will actually be able to keep us safe!!! All the “tax cuts” in the world don’t matter people, if we are attacked and overtaken by our enemies.
And one more thing — all this Sarah Palin doesn’t love America stuff makes no sense! Why would she and Todd be supportive of their eldest son fighting in Iraq if they didn’t love America?! I am sure he didn’t come to that conclusion entirely on his own . . .
October 29, 2008 at 1:27 pm |
Judging from the previous two poster’s comments, they think it’s far better to vote for the “America-hater” Sarah Palin than the America-lover” (Barack Obama.) Vote Republican — even if it’s BAD for America!
October 29, 2008 at 2:27 pm |
I agree. Palin is a joke as a candidate to begin with, but once you throw in her anti-american husband and over-the-top religous zeal she makes one hell of a dangerous candidate.I’m not saying that She isn’t happy to be here, I’m just saying that having her in any sort of position of power is dangerous for America. Example A: Breaking ethics code while serving as gov.
As far as voting for McCain because he will somehow keep America safer? That’s a load of shit. McCain has an aggresive agenda for expanding America influence in areas where it’s not welcome. McCain doesn’t understand that just because it works in America doesn’t mean it will work in Iraq or Afghanistan (and by it, I mean democracy). Some cultures aren’t used to the idea of democracy. It doesn’t make them worse as a people just different. Values are different in other countries. That doesn’t mean America needs to step in everytime, which is what you get with McCain. With McCain as president, terrorist attacks on American soil will increase. With McCain as president, more of the world will hate Aggressor America.
October 29, 2008 at 4:34 pm |
YOU PEOPLE MAKE ME SICK……………..
October 29, 2008 at 4:36 pm |
and Obama is a terriest hags with um loves on um…. so whats the big deal….. by the way FYI Todd was not a member, do some homework liers
October 29, 2008 at 5:11 pm |
It’s quite hard to take the word of a man who’s language is unintelligible…
October 29, 2008 at 5:19 pm |
I agree with Tom, Todd wasn’t a member and even if he was what does that have to do with Sarah? Nothing. She’s her own woman. She’s the accomplished one, not Todd. Gov. Palin has committed her life to being honest and serving the American people as best she can. To even hint that she is somehow even associated with anti-American sentiments is just ridiculous. Jackass: McCain has years of not only experience in the Senate, but also years of LIVING history unlike this fresh-faced Obama. Obama is all cheap talk. He’s one-run and done. He’s a joke. He’s also been reading far to much Marx lately. His plans push America closer and closer to USSR style rule. I don’t know about anyone else, but I sure don’t want Big Brother in my room. America is about freedom and the more government oversight there is, the less freedom we have. Freedom doesn’t always create betterment for all people. With freedom, the strongest rise while the weaker fail. Anything other than this natural cycle is sure to fail. Nature hasn’t designed all things to be equal. “Spreading the wealth” as Obama has suggested just isn’t possible. It sound nice to a lot of Americans, but sinply isn’t possible without the government stepping on all our our balls. Not only that but Obama does have strong Islamic feelings. He has been known to quote passages from the Quran as teaching lessons during his time as a professor. This man is dangerous. Very dangerous.